|
Anyone have experience comparing a Sire Larry Carlton H7 vs any of the Eastman semi-hollow body 335 style guitars? And let's throw in the Epiphone IBC ES-335 since that sits somewhere between the Sire and the Eastmans in terms of price.
I've seen great reviews of the Sire, the only consistent point of critique being a pretty narrow nut at around 40mm iirc, though currently on Sire's website it says 43mm, which is pretty standard. So either they have inconsistent nut width, or they've made the nut wider according to past feedback.
I don't care much for a Bigsby, and I'm looking for humbuckers.
I like the varnish finishes on some of the Eastman models since they sound great on acoustics, so I guess the T59/v would be the logical choice, BUT I don't really know how much the finish plays a role on a semi-hollow model like this where the pickups sit in a piece of wood so thick (the center block) that you would never argue it can sound good if it were an acoustic guitar (not to mention the fact that the guitar is made of laminated wood). In other words, 'tonewood' might not matter here in my opinion, and therefore neither does the finish? idk, I guess it comes down mostly to the pickups.
My question then is, apart from the Eastman having Seymour Duncans and the Sire having some proprietary pickups, is there really that much of a difference? I could basically buy 4 Sires for the price of one T59/v.
Just from my impression online I see the Sire as great budget-ish guitar that beats way above its price, while Eastman is essentially offering close to Gibson Custom shop levels of quality at a more affordable price, but still it costs some serious money.
I should add: I have a Sire P-bass that I put flatwounds on, and it plays and feels amazing. fwiw I'm not a bassist, but still.
I'm also open to other Eastman models, particularly the truetone vintage gloss and how it compares to the varnish, but maybe I should make another thread for that. I understand the truetone vintage gloss replaced what used to be nitro lacquer?
|